Vellum Insights

Welcome!

  • ⚔️ How El Salvador’s Military Helped Curb Its Crime Problem

    Introduction: From Murder Capital to Security Success

    For years, El Salvador was known as one of the most violent countries in the world. Gangs like MS-13 and Barrio 18 controlled neighborhoods, demanded extortion money from businesses, and killed thousands every year.

    At its worst, in 2015, the country recorded over 6,600 murders — one of the highest murder rates anywhere on Earth.

    But in the past few years, something dramatic has changed. Under President Nayib Bukele, El Salvador launched a state of emergency, sending the military and police into the streets to crush gang power.

    Today, the country reports one of the lowest murder rates in Latin America, and many Salvadorans say they feel safe for the first time in decades.

    How did the military help turn things around? What are the risks of this strategy? And what lessons does it teach the world about crime and security?

    Part 1: The Gangs That Terrorized a Nation

    To understand the military’s role, we first need to understand the enemy.

    • MS-13 (Mara Salvatrucha): Founded in Los Angeles by Salvadoran immigrants in the 1980s, this gang grew into a transnational criminal organization. Known for brutal violence, extortion, and control of territory.
    • Barrio 18 (18th Street Gang): A rival gang that also originated in the U.S. before spreading back to Central America. Equally powerful and violent.

    These gangs didn’t just commit crimes. They ruled communities. Entire neighborhoods lived under gang control, with “invisible borders” that civilians could not cross without permission.

    Schools, small businesses, bus drivers, and even street vendors were forced to pay “la renta” — extortion money. Those who refused were often killed.

    By the mid-2010s, El Salvador became ungovernable in many areas.

    Part 2: Bukele’s State of Emergency

    When President Bukele took office in 2019, he promised to restore order.

    In March 2022, after a sudden surge of 87 murders in just one weekend, Bukele declared a “State of Exception” (Estado de Excepción).

    This gave the government emergency powers:

    • Military and police could arrest suspects without warrants.
    • The government suspended some constitutional rights, like freedom of assembly.
    • Thousands of suspected gang members were rounded up.

    The military became central to this campaign. Armed soldiers patrolled neighborhoods, guarded prisons, and set up checkpoints across the country.

    Part 3: The Role of the Military

    The military was not new to El Salvador’s streets. Soldiers had been used in anti-gang patrols before. But under Bukele, their role expanded dramatically.

    1. Mass Deployments

    Bukele sent tens of thousands of troops into gang-controlled areas. Soldiers patrolled streets, searched vehicles, and set up permanent outposts.

    2. Siege of Cities

    In late 2022, Bukele ordered entire towns surrounded by soldiers to flush out gang members. For example, in Soyapango, a city of over 200,000, the military locked down the area until arrests were made.

    3. Prison Control

    The military helped oversee prisons, which once served as command centers for gangs. With new mega-prisons built, soldiers now control entrances, ensuring no communication escapes.

    4. Psychological Warfare

    Bukele used images of heavily armed soldiers marching into cities as a symbol of state power. This was as much about fear as about security — signaling to gangs that the government was in control.

    Part 4: Results of the Crackdown

    The results have been staggering:

    • In 2015: El Salvador recorded a homicide rate of 106 per 100,000 people — the worst in the world.
    • In 2023: That number dropped to 2.4 per 100,000 — one of the lowest in the Western Hemisphere.

    Bukele now claims that El Salvador is the safest country in Latin America.

    For ordinary Salvadorans, the difference is visible:

    • Children can walk to school without fear.
    • Bus drivers no longer pay daily extortion fees.
    • Businesses are reopening in once-dangerous areas.

    Part 5: Stories from the Ground

    To humanize this transformation, let’s look at how people experience it.

    • A market vendor in San Salvador: “Before, every week I had to pay $20 to the gang. If not, they would kill me. Now I can work in peace.”
    • A mother in Soyapango: “I lost my son in 2018. He was 16, killed because he crossed into the wrong neighborhood. Today, my younger children can play outside again.”
    • A soldier in the operation: “We are not here just to fight. We are here to show the people that the state is present, that fear belongs to the gangs, not the people.”

    Part 6: The Criticisms

    While many Salvadorans support Bukele’s plan, international organizations have raised serious concerns.

    • Human Rights Issues: Over 70,000 people have been arrested, often without trial. Some families say innocent people were taken just for living in gang-heavy neighborhoods.
    • Due Process Suspended: Courts are overloaded, and many detainees remain in jail without charges.
    • Authoritarian Concerns: Critics argue Bukele is using security to consolidate power, eroding democracy.

    Groups like Human Rights Watch warn that while the crackdown has reduced crime, it may come at the cost of freedom and justice.

    Part 7: Strategic Lessons from El Salvador

    El Salvador’s military-led strategy offers several lessons:

    1. Show of Force Can Break Criminal Power
      By deploying overwhelming military strength, Bukele shocked the gangs and broke their ability to operate openly.
    2. Control of Territory is Key
      Gangs survive by controlling neighborhoods. By sieging cities, the military reclaimed territory for the state.
    3. Fear Can Work Both Ways
      For years, gangs ruled through fear. Now, the state uses fear against the gangs, reversing the psychological balance.
    4. But Balance is Needed
      Military power alone is not sustainable. Without social programs, jobs, and rehabilitation, future generations could return to crime.

    Part 8: What the Future Holds

    El Salvador’s future depends on whether it can maintain security without sliding into authoritarianism.

    • If Bukele builds jobs, education, and opportunities, the country could escape the cycle of violence for good.
    • If the military crackdown remains the only tool, gangs could resurface in the future — or resentment could grow among innocent families caught up in the arrests.

    Still, for now, Salvadorans are enjoying a level of safety that seemed impossible just a few years ago.

    Conclusion: Soldiers on the Streets, Safety in the Homes

    El Salvador’s story is one of the most dramatic security turnarounds in the world. From being the murder capital of the planet to claiming the title of safest country in Latin America, the transformation is tied directly to the military’s role in Bukele’s war on gangs.

    But it is also a reminder of the delicate balance between security and freedom. Soldiers with rifles can make the streets safe — but the question remains: at what cost to democracy?

    For now, Salvadorans seem willing to accept that cost. And the world is watching closely, as El Salvador becomes a case study in how far military power can go in solving crime — and where its limits may lie.

  • Cuba’s Doctors: The Secret Weapon of Survival

    Introduction: Medicine as a Weapon of Influence

    When people think of power, they imagine tanks, bombs, or armies. But Cuba, a small island under decades of sanctions, found another kind of weapon: doctors.

    For over 50 years, Cuba has sent tens of thousands of medical professionals abroad — not just to friendly countries, but also to nations struck by disaster, poverty, or war. This medical diplomacy has turned Cuba’s doctors into ambassadors in white coats, spreading influence and keeping the regime alive.

    Part 1: The Origins of Cuba’s Medical Army

    After the revolution in 1959, Fidel Castro realized that healthcare could be more than a domestic policy. It could be a way to win friends and allies.

    • In 1960, Cuba sent its first medical brigade to Chile after a devastating earthquake.
    • By the 1960s and 70s, Cuban doctors were working in newly independent African states like Angola and Algeria, tying Cuba to the anti-colonial movement.
    • The message was simple: while America sent soldiers, Cuba sent doctors.

    Part 2: How the System Works

    Cuba invests heavily in medical education:

    • Medical school is free in Cuba.
    • Doctors are trained not just in hospitals but also in community outreach, making Cuban healthcare highly people-centered.

    When Cuba sends doctors abroad:

    • Host countries often pay the Cuban government, not the doctors directly.
    • This gives Cuba foreign currency, which is vital for survival under sanctions.
    • Doctors get only a portion of the money, but they also gain experience and prestige.

    At its peak, Cuba had over 50,000 medical workers in 60 countries.

    Part 3: Doctors as Soft Power

    Sending doctors accomplishes several goals for Cuba:

    1. Diplomatic Goodwill
      • Countries that receive Cuban doctors often support Cuba in the United Nations or shield it from U.S. pressure.
      • Example: Many African states still back Cuba diplomatically because of its medical and military support during their independence struggles.
    2. Economic Survival
      • Medical services became Cuba’s largest export, even bigger than sugar or tourism at times.
      • Between 2011 and 2018, Cuba reportedly earned $11 billion annually from its overseas medical missions.
    3. Propaganda and Image
      • Cuba presents itself as a humanitarian superpower, punching far above its size.
      • The image of Cuban doctors saving lives builds sympathy, even in countries hostile to Cuba politically.

    Part 4: Case Studies of Cuba’s Medical Diplomacy

    Africa: Angola and Ebola

    • In Angola’s civil war (1975–2002), Cuba sent both soldiers and doctors. The doctors won long-lasting goodwill that soldiers alone could not.
    • In 2014, when West Africa was hit by Ebola, Cuba sent more than 250 doctors and nurses. They were some of the first foreign responders on the ground.

    Latin America: Venezuela’s Oil-for-Doctors Deal

    • Venezuela, under Hugo Chávez, struck a deal with Cuba: cheap oil in exchange for Cuban doctors.
    • This alliance kept Cuba’s economy afloat during the Special Period’s aftermath.
    • For Venezuela’s poor, Cuban doctors became the only access to free healthcare.

    Global Pandemic: COVID-19 Response

    • During the COVID-19 pandemic, Cuban doctors traveled to Italy, South Africa, and Caribbean nations to help fight the virus.
    • While wealthier countries struggled, Cuba leveraged its medical army to gain international spotlight.

    Part 5: Criticism and Controversy

    Cuba’s doctor diplomacy is not without criticism:

    • Many accuse the Cuban government of exploiting its doctors, taking most of their earnings.
    • Some doctors defected while abroad, seeking better pay and freedom.
    • The U.S. has called these missions “modern slavery” and tried to pressure countries to reject them.

    Yet, despite the controversy, Cuba’s model remains attractive to many nations desperate for affordable medical care.

    Part 6: Strategic Lessons from the Doctor Diplomacy

    1. Health as Foreign Policy
      • Cuba turned healthcare — usually a domestic issue — into a global weapon of influence.
    2. Small States Can Lead
      • Cuba, an island with limited resources, used doctors to outshine richer nations in humanitarian response.
    3. Resilience through Reputation
      • Even under sanctions, Cuba kept itself relevant by building a reputation for saving lives.

    Conclusion: White Coats as Cuba’s True Army

    Cuba has very few tools to survive against U.S. pressure. But in the end, its most effective weapon has not been missiles or ideology — it has been the Cuban doctor.

    By sending doctors abroad, Cuba gained money, allies, and global influence. While controversial, the strategy shows the power of soft power in survival.

    Cuba’s lesson is simple: not all weapons carry bullets. Some carry stethoscopes.

  • 🇨🇺 How Cuba Survived 70 Years Against All Odds: A Story of Strategy, Survival, and Soft Power

    Introduction: The Island That Refuses to Fall

    For more than 70 years, Cuba has stood as one of the world’s biggest political mysteries.


    How can a small island, just 90 miles off the coast of the United States — the most powerful nation in history — survive decades of sanctions, diplomatic isolation, economic collapse, and even the fall of its main ally, the Soviet Union?

    Most countries in Cuba’s position would have collapsed long ago. Yet Cuba is still standing, still defiant, and still a player in global politics.

    This blog takes you on a journey into how Cuba survived, from Fidel Castro’s revolution in 1959 to today’s modern challenges. We’ll break it down into simple, clear lessons on strategy, resilience, and soft power — lessons that bigger nations sometimes forget.

    Part 1: The Cuban Revolution and the Roots of Survival

    A Small Island, A Big Revolution

    In 1959, Fidel Castro and his revolutionaries overthrew the U.S.-backed dictator Fulgencio Batista. What followed was not just a change in government but a complete transformation of Cuban society.

    • Land reforms gave property to peasants.
    • Literacy campaigns made education free and widespread.
    • Healthcare became universal.

    But most importantly, Cuba aligned itself with the Soviet Union, entering the Cold War as the West’s tropical enemy.

    Survival Lesson 1: Turn Weakness into Strength

    Cuba couldn’t fight the U.S. head-on. Instead, Castro made Cuba valuable to the Soviet Union, which protected it in exchange for a communist ally near America’s shores. This gave Cuba breathing room to build its new identity.

    Part 2: The Bay of Pigs and the Cuban Missile Crisis

    The Failed Invasion

    In 1961, the U.S. launched the Bay of Pigs invasion, hoping to overthrow Castro using Cuban exiles. The invasion failed miserably. This was a psychological victory for Cuba — David had stood up to Goliath.

    The World on the Edge

    One year later, in 1962, the Cuban Missile Crisis brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. The Soviets placed nuclear missiles in Cuba, and the U.S. responded with a naval blockade.

    In the end, the missiles were removed, but Cuba emerged with something priceless:

    • Global recognition as a player in world politics.
    • A reputation for standing up to America.

    Survival Lesson 2: Symbolism is Power

    Even when outgunned, Cuba learned that symbolic victories matter. By showing defiance, it built an image that rallied supporters across Latin America, Africa, and beyond.

    Part 3: Life Under Sanctions

    For decades, the U.S. has maintained an economic embargo against Cuba. This meant no free trade with its closest and richest neighbor. Most economies would collapse under such pressure.

    So how did Cuba survive?

    The Sugar-for-Oil Deal

    The Soviet Union bought Cuban sugar at high prices and sold oil to Cuba cheaply. This deal kept Cuba afloat throughout the Cold War.

    Soft Power in Medicine

    Cuba invested heavily in healthcare and trained thousands of doctors. Later, it exported medical professionals to other countries in exchange for money, oil, or political support. Even today, Cuban doctors are deployed worldwide, building goodwill.

    Culture as Diplomacy

    From salsa music to Cuban baseball players, culture became a soft power tool. Despite sanctions, Cuban art and sport traveled the world, keeping the island relevant and admired.

    Survival Lesson 3: Adapt and Diversify

    Cuba showed that survival is not just about armies and weapons. Culture, healthcare, and diplomacy can be as powerful as military strength.

    Part 4: The “Special Period” After the USSR Collapse

    When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Cuba lost its main economic lifeline. Suddenly, the island was on its own. This period is known as the Special Period — and it nearly broke Cuba.

    • Oil imports dropped by 70%.
    • Food shortages were everywhere.
    • People rode bicycles instead of cars due to lack of fuel.

    But Cuba adapted creatively:

    • It shifted to organic farming to deal with fertilizer shortages.
    • It opened limited tourism to bring in foreign currency.
    • It relied on remittances from Cubans abroad.

    Survival Lesson 4: Resilience is Innovation

    Instead of collapsing, Cuba showed resilience by changing its economy, even if painfully. Survival meant bending, not breaking.

    Part 5: Exporting Revolution

    Cuba didn’t just play defense. It also exported revolution:

    • Supported African liberation movements (Angola, Mozambique).
    • Sent doctors, teachers, and soldiers abroad.
    • Became a symbol of resistance for leftist movements in Latin America.

    Even though Cuba was small, this made it a global influencer, far larger than its size suggested.

    Survival Lesson 5: Influence Can Outweigh Size

    By projecting influence abroad, Cuba made itself too significant to ignore — a strategy small nations can copy.

    Part 6: Cuba and the 21st Century

    The Digital Age

    In recent years, Cuba has faced new challenges:

    • Struggling economy due to ongoing sanctions.
    • Protests over lack of food and freedom.
    • Younger generations less loyal to revolutionary ideals.

    But it also gained new opportunities:

    • Tourism (before COVID) became a major income source.
    • Relationships with countries like Venezuela, Russia, and China helped balance U.S. pressure.
    • Cultural exports like music (think reggaeton) kept Cuban identity strong worldwide.

    Obama’s Opening, Trump’s Reversal, Biden’s Balance

    • In 2016, President Obama visited Cuba, the first U.S. president to do so in 88 years. There was hope for a new era.
    • Under Trump, restrictions returned.
    • Biden has kept a cautious middle ground.

    Cuba remains in limbo, surviving but struggling.

    Part 7: The Core Pillars of Cuba’s Survival Strategy

    Let’s summarize Cuba’s playbook for survival:

    1. Deterrence through Symbolism → Standing up to the U.S. gave it legendary status.
    2. Strategic Alliances → Soviet Union yesterday, Venezuela and Russia today.
    3. Soft Power Exports → Doctors, music, sports, and culture spread influence.
    4. Resilience through Adaptation → Organic farming, tourism, remittances.
    5. Control of the Narrative → The Cuban government shaped its story as one of resistance and independence.

    Conclusion: The Island That Teaches Strategy

    Cuba is not a superpower. It’s not rich. It’s not technologically advanced. Yet it has survived for more than 70 years against incredible odds.

    Its survival is not luck — it’s strategy. Symbolism, alliances, culture, and resilience are its weapons.

    For small states around the world, Cuba proves that survival is possible even when facing a giant. For bigger powers, it’s a reminder that raw strength doesn’t guarantee victory if the opponent knows how to survive smartly.

  • 🇰🇵 North Korea: Survival Through Strategy in the 21st Century

    Introduction

    North Korea (the DPRK) often makes headlines for its nuclear tests, missile launches, and fiery rhetoric. Yet, beneath the theatrics lies one of the most sophisticated survival strategies in modern geopolitics. Despite being isolated, sanctioned, and resource-poor, the DPRK has survived for over 70 years against vastly more powerful adversaries. This raises an important question: how does the regime endure?

    The answer lies in its unique blend of military deterrence, asymmetric tactics, and psychological control — making North Korea a case study in how small states can resist great powers.

    1. Nuclear Weapons: The Ultimate Insurance Policy

    • North Korea’s nuclear arsenal is the cornerstone of regime survival.
    • Unlike conventional weapons, nukes deter not only invasion but also regime change operations like those seen in Iraq and Libya.
    • For Pyongyang, denuclearization is existential; giving up nukes would remove its strongest bargaining chip.
    • With advances in ICBM technology capable of reaching the U.S. mainland, North Korea ensures it cannot be ignored on the world stage.

    2. Asymmetric Warfare Capabilities

    North Korea cannot outmatch the U.S. or South Korea conventionally, so it invests in asymmetry:

    • Missiles & Artillery: Thousands of artillery pieces positioned to devastate Seoul in hours.
    • Cyber Warfare: The Lazarus Group, blamed for bank heists, ransomware (WannaCry), and crypto thefts worth billions. Cyber operations serve both fundraising and disruption.
    • Special Forces: Estimated at over 200,000 troops, trained for infiltration, guerrilla warfare, and sabotage.
    • Chemical & Biological Weapons: Though unconfirmed, widely suspected to be stockpiled as part of deterrence.

    3. Information Control: The Hermit Firewall

    • Domestically, the regime maintains total information dominance through propaganda and surveillance.
    • Externally, it weaponizes information through threats, staged diplomacy, and timed provocations.
    • The regime masters the art of the “calibrated crisis”: escalate tensions to extract concessions, then de-escalate to secure aid.

    4. Diplomacy as Theater

    • North Korea treats diplomacy as an extension of psychological warfare.
    • Engagements with the U.S., China, and South Korea are choreographed to create leverage rather than achieve reconciliation.
    • Example: The 2018 Trump-Kim summits — historic in optics, limited in substance, but strategically useful for Pyongyang.

    5. Economic Survival Through Illicit Networks

    Sanctions have crippled formal trade, but the DPRK has adapted:

    • Shadow Tanker Fleets to smuggle oil.
    • Arms Sales to African and Middle Eastern states.
    • Crypto Theft & Mining as a major revenue stream.
    • China as Lifeline: Despite sanctions, China provides food, fuel, and trade, ensuring Pyongyang doesn’t collapse.

    6. Regional Dynamics: Playing Giants Against Each Other

    • China: Sees North Korea as a buffer state against U.S. forces in South Korea.
    • Russia: Increasingly aligns with Pyongyang to counter Western sanctions, exchanging oil, arms, and political cover.
    • South Korea & the U.S.: Trapped between deterrence and escalation risks.
    • Pyongyang’s genius lies in exploiting rivalries between great powers to avoid isolation.

    7. Future Scenarios

    1. Status Quo Survival → Nuclear-armed, sanctions in place, periodic crises.
    2. China-Russia Axis → Closer alignment with Beijing and Moscow as U.S. rivalry intensifies.
    3. Sudden Collapse → Triggered by internal instability (though less likely due to regime control).
    4. Nuclear Normalization → The world accepts North Korea as a permanent nuclear power, shifting focus to containment rather than denuclearization.

    Conclusion

    North Korea is often portrayed as irrational or erratic, but its survival proves the opposite: the regime is rational within its own framework. By blending nuclear deterrence, asymmetric warfare, information control, and cunning diplomacy, Pyongyang has turned weakness into strength.

    For policymakers, ignoring the DPRK is impossible — it is a small state with outsized strategic impact. For strategists, North Korea serves as a reminder that in the 21st century, survival is not about resources or allies alone, but about mastering the art of asymmetry and narrative control.

  • Al Jazeera and the Power of the Narrative: Media as a Strategic Weapon

    Introduction

    In the age of information, media outlets have become more than platforms for news — they are tools of influence, diplomacy, and even warfare. Al Jazeera, the Qatar-based broadcaster, is one of the clearest examples of how a small state can wield disproportionate global power through media.

    By shaping narratives across the Arab world and beyond, Al Jazeera has transformed into Doha’s most powerful strategic asset.

    Origins and Evolution

    • Founded in 1996 with funding from Qatar’s Emir, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani.
    • Originally staffed by ex-BBC Arabic journalists, giving it credibility and professionalism from the outset.
    • Positioned as the first independent Arab news channel, breaking with the region’s state-controlled media culture.

    Regional Influence (Arab World)

    1. Breaking Taboos
      • Al Jazeera aired debates on democracy, corruption, women’s rights, and authoritarianism — topics avoided by most Arab networks.
      • By doing so, it influenced Arab public opinion and pressured regional regimes.
    2. The Arab Spring (2011)
      • Al Jazeera’s wall-to-wall coverage of protests in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya magnified the revolutions.
      • It became the voice of the Arab street, accelerating regime changes and unsettling Gulf monarchies (except Qatar).
    3. Soft Power Projection
      • For Qatar, hosting Al Jazeera meant controlling the megaphone of the Arab world.
      • Doha leveraged this influence to punch above its weight diplomatically, despite its small size.

    Global Influence (Al Jazeera English)

    • Launched in 2006, Al Jazeera English expanded Qatar’s reach to Western and Global South audiences.
    • Promoted narratives critical of U.S. foreign policy, the Iraq War, and Western double standards.
    • Established credibility in Africa, Asia, and Latin America as a counterweight to CNN and BBC.

    🪖 Al Jazeera as a Strategic Weapon

    1. Information Warfare
      • During the Iraq War (2003), Al Jazeera broadcast images of U.S. casualties, undermining the Pentagon’s message of a “clean war.”
      • Western governments accused it of spreading insurgent propaganda, while Arab viewers praised its uncensored reporting.
    2. Diplomatic Shield
      • Al Jazeera gave Qatar leverage against bigger neighbors (Saudi Arabia, UAE).
      • When Gulf states blockaded Qatar in 2017, one of their key demands was the shutdown of Al Jazeera.
    3. Narrative Shaping
      • Frames Qatar as a progressive, independent mediator.
      • Simultaneously undermines rival powers by highlighting their repression or foreign policy failures.

    Criticisms and Double Standards

    • While presenting itself as independent, Al Jazeera avoids serious criticism of Qatar’s monarchy.
    • Accused of being a megaphone for Doha’s foreign policy, especially during regional disputes (e.g., coverage favoring Islamist groups during the Arab Spring).
    • Western critics see it as a soft-power arm of Qatari strategy, not true independent journalism.

    Soft Power Lessons from Al Jazeera

    1. Small States, Big Influence → Even without a large military, media can give global leverage.
    2. Narrative Control Matters → By telling stories others avoid, Al Jazeera shaped public opinion and policy debates.
    3. Soft Power as Deterrence → Qatar’s “media shield” helped it survive geopolitical isolation, as silencing Al Jazeera would cause global backlash.
    4. Weaponized Credibility → By winning trust as a news source, it could insert Doha’s strategic narratives subtly, without appearing overtly propagandistic.

    Conclusion

    Al Jazeera demonstrates that influence in the information age is not about size but reach.

    Qatar’s flagship network is more than a news outlet — it is a strategic instrument of national power, capable of shaping discourse, undermining rivals, and amplifying Doha’s role on the global stage. In many ways, Al Jazeera is Qatar’s aircraft carrier: not made of steel, but of stories

  • TikTok and the Art of Influence: China’s Regional PsyOps Strategy

    Introduction

    Psychological warfare has always relied on the ability to shape narratives and influence public opinion. In the 21st century, the battlefield has shifted to social media — and China’s TikTok has emerged as the most potent tool in this new domain.

    With over 1 billion global users, TikTok has become not just entertainment, but a platform of strategic influence — one that rivals traditional state propaganda machines.

    TikTok as a PsyOps Tool

    1. Algorithmic Advantage
      • TikTok’s “For You” algorithm ensures content spreads virally based on engagement, not connections.
      • This allows narratives — political, cultural, or social — to spread faster than on Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter.
    2. Narrative Engineering
      • Beijing-linked entities can amplify stories favorable to China (e.g., portraying stability, technological progress).
      • Simultaneously, negative or critical content can be throttled or suppressed.
    3. Generational Targeting
      • TikTok’s primary demographic (Gen Z and Millennials) represents future voters, soldiers, and leaders.
      • By shaping their worldview early, long-term geopolitical narratives can be established.

    Regional Case Studies

    1. Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines)

    • Content emphasizing Chinese culture and economic strength often trends.
    • Anti-U.S. narratives (e.g., highlighting past interventions or racial tensions) appear subtly.
    • Goal: Position China as a natural partner in Asia, while framing the U.S. as unreliable.

    2. United States

    • Content moderation controversies show potential manipulation.
    • During sensitive times (e.g., U.S. elections, protests), narratives around race, inequality, and foreign policy can be amplified.
    • Goal: Exploit internal polarization to weaken U.S. global standing.

    3. Europe

    • Narratives targeting NATO unity (e.g., anti-war, anti-U.S. bases, energy crisis discontent).
    • Content promoting “neutrality” resonates strongly in states like Hungary and Slovakia.
    • Goal: Erode Western cohesion on sanctions, Ukraine, and defense policies.

    4. India & South Asia

    • TikTok was banned in India in 2020, but similar Chinese apps continue targeting the region.
    • PsyOps shifted toward economic and cultural outreach through alternative platforms.
    • Goal: Reduce Indian influence in South Asia while promoting China’s Belt and Road narrative.

    Methods of Influence

    • Memetic Warfare → Humor, trends, and viral memes used to push political messages subtly.
    • Content Flooding → Overloading the digital space with pro-China content to drown out critics.
    • Controlled Outrage → Amplifying divisive topics (race, gender, politics) to fracture societies.
    • Shadow Bans → Silencing activists, dissidents, or narratives critical of Beijing.

    Risks and Countermeasures

    For Democracies:

    • Media Literacy Campaigns → Educate citizens on manipulation tactics.
    • Algorithm Audits → Independent oversight of recommendation engines.
    • Platform Diversification → Encourage local or allied social media alternatives.

    For China:

    • Risk of overexposure — if TikTok is increasingly seen as a propaganda arm, backlash (like India’s ban) could spread.
    • Dependency on global access means any coordinated Western ban would blunt its effectiveness.

    Conclusion

    TikTok is not just an app — it is a strategic weapon in China’s psychological operations toolkit. By blending entertainment with subtle influence, Beijing has unlocked a way to shape global narratives at scale and speed.

    For policymakers, militaries, and citizens alike, understanding TikTok’s role is crucial to navigating the new age of digital psyops.

  • Psychological Operations (PSYOPs): The Invisible Battlefield of Modern Warfare

    Introduction: Wars of the Mind

    Throughout history, the strongest armies and largest economies often dictated who won wars. Yet, in the 21st century, a new type of power is emerging — the ability to shape perception, control narratives, and influence how people think. This is the world of Psychological Operations (PSYOPs).

    Unlike tanks, drones, or cyberattacks, PSYOPs strike at the invisible domain — the human mind. They can make an army surrender before firing a shot, destabilize societies from within, or even rewrite history in real time. Increasingly, victory in war doesn’t just belong to those who win the battlefield, but to those who win the story.

    Defining PSYOPs: Beyond Propaganda

    At its core, Psychological Operations (PSYOPs) are coordinated efforts to influence the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of specific groups to achieve political or military goals.

    They differ from simple propaganda because they are:

    • Targeted: Directed at specific groups (enemy soldiers, local populations, international communities).
    • Systematic: Planned and executed like a military campaign.
    • Multidomain: Delivered through media, cyber platforms, rumors, cultural symbols, and even economic cues.

    The U.S. Department of Defense defines PSYOPs as:

    “Planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of foreign governments, organizations, groups, and individuals.”

    Historical Roots: From Ancient Deception to Modern PSYOPs

    PSYOPs are not new — they are as old as warfare itself.

    Ancient Examples

    • Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War” emphasized deception as the highest form of strategy: “All warfare is based on deception.”
    • Genghis Khan spread exaggerated rumors of his armies’ brutality, causing cities to surrender without a fight.
    • The Trojan Horse was one of the earliest symbolic PSYOPs — using cultural symbols of peace (a “gift”) to achieve military victory.

    World Wars

    • World War I: Both sides used leaflets dropped from planes to demoralize enemy troops.
    • World War II: Radio propaganda became a weapon. The Allies broadcast “Voice of America,” while Germany fielded Lord Haw-Haw, and Japan used Tokyo Rose to target Allied morale.

    Cold War

    • The U.S. and USSR battled for ideological dominance, using Radio Free Europe, Hollywood, and cultural exchanges as tools of influence.
    • The space race wasn’t just about rockets — it was a PSYOP to prove superiority of one system over the other.

    Modern PSYOPs: From Leaflets to Algorithms

    The digital revolution transformed PSYOPs. No longer limited to pamphlets or radio waves, modern PSYOPs exploit social media, AI, and instant communication.

    Key Features Today:

    1. Speed: Narratives spread globally within minutes.
    2. Scale: A single meme or video can reach millions.
    3. Plausible Deniability: States can use proxies — “troll farms,” influencers, bots — making attribution difficult.
    4. Personalization: AI-driven micro-targeting delivers propaganda tailored to individuals.

    Digital Tactics

    • Social Media Swarms: Coordinated bot networks amplifying hashtags.
    • Memetic Warfare: Using humor, satire, and memes to disarm or ridicule opponents.
    • Deepfakes: Realistic fake videos eroding trust in truth itself.
    • Narrative Flooding: Overloading the information space to drown out alternative perspectives.

    Case Studies: PSYOPs in Action

    1. Ukraine vs. Russia (2014–Present)

    • Russia deployed disinformation campaigns, portraying Ukraine as fascist and illegitimate.
    • Ukraine countered with viral videos of resistance, using humor to rally both domestic and international audiences.
    • Telegram became the battlefield: Russians spread demoralizing content, while Ukrainians used it for real-time morale building.

    2. ISIS and Online Radicalization (2014–2019)

    • ISIS turned Twitter and YouTube into recruitment hubs.
    • Slickly produced videos glamorized life in the caliphate, appealing to disillusioned youth.
    • This showed how non-state actors could rival nation-states in psychological influence.

    3. China’s Information Strategy

    • China uses TikTok, WeChat, and state media to spread favorable narratives abroad while controlling information domestically.
    • “Wolf Warrior” diplomacy pushes assertive national pride.
    • Economic influence (like Belt and Road Initiative branding) doubles as a soft-power PSYOP.

    4. U.S. Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan

    • Leaflets, radio broadcasts, and psychological campaigns targeted insurgents and local populations.
    • The challenge: modern populations are media-savvy and harder to manipulate with blunt propaganda.

    The Future: Cognitive Warfare

    NATO and military strategists now warn of Cognitive Warfare — the next evolution of PSYOPs, where the aim is to hack the decision-making process itself.

    Emerging tools:

    • AI-driven Propaganda: Bots crafting individualized persuasive messages.
    • Neurotechnology: Brain-computer interfaces potentially vulnerable to manipulation.
    • Synthetic Media: Virtual influencers delivering state-sponsored content seamlessly.
    • Psychographic Profiling: Data-driven manipulation based on personality traits.

    This represents a shift from influencing what people think to how people think.

    Strategic Importance of PSYOPs

    Why are PSYOPs so powerful?

    1. Cost-Effective: Memes are cheaper than missiles.
    2. Plausible Deniability: Hard to trace back to a government.
    3. Force Multiplier: Can amplify military operations by weakening morale.
    4. Political Leverage: Can destabilize rival societies without open war.

    Countering PSYOPs: Defense Against the Invisible Weapon

    Nations are scrambling to build defenses.

    • Media Literacy Programs: Finland and Baltic states are teaching citizens to spot disinformation.
    • AI Tools: Detecting bot swarms and deepfakes.
    • Narrative Warfare: Building compelling “truth campaigns” rather than censorship.
    • Allied Coordination: NATO and the EU are establishing rapid response teams for disinformation.

    Conclusion: The Invisible War Has Begun

    In the wars of the future, battles may still involve drones, tanks, and missiles — but decisive blows can be struck in the information space. PSYOPs are evolving from propaganda to cognitive warfare, where the real objective is not territory or resources, but the hearts and minds of populations.

    As the line between truth and falsehood blurs, societies must ask: how can we protect not just our borders, but our perceptions, beliefs, and very sense of reality?

  • Proxy Wars: The Invisible Battlefields of Modern Geopolitics

    When most people think of war, they picture armies clashing head-on, nations declaring hostilities, and clear lines of conflict. But in the 21st century, the most consequential wars are rarely fought directly. Instead, they unfold through proxy wars — conflicts where powerful states back local actors, militias, or governments to advance their own agendas without openly engaging.

    Proxy wars are not new, but they have evolved. From Cold War standoffs to today’s fragmented battlegrounds in the Middle East, Africa, and Eastern Europe, they remain the preferred tool of great powers to test strength, shape regions, and undermine rivals — all while maintaining plausible deniability.

    What Exactly Is a Proxy War?

    At its core, a proxy war is a conflict in which external powers provide support — arms, training, funding, intelligence — to local actors, rather than deploying their own armies directly. These wars are attractive because they:

    • Reduce direct political risk.
    • Keep costs lower than deploying full militaries.
    • Provide a testing ground for new weapons and strategies.
    • Allow states to weaken adversaries indirectly.

    Yet, the true cost of proxy wars is almost always borne by the local populations, who face protracted instability, humanitarian disasters, and economic collapse.

    The Cold War Playbook

    During the Cold War, proxy wars became the default mode of great power competition:

    • Vietnam (1955–1975): A classic proxy clash, where the US fought to contain communism while the USSR and China supported North Vietnam.
    • Afghanistan (1979–1989): The CIA funneled weapons to Afghan mujahideen to counter the Soviet invasion. Moscow eventually withdrew — a Soviet defeat that hastened the USSR’s collapse.
    • Middle East Rivalries: The Arab-Israeli wars, Egypt-Soviet ties, and US backing of Israel all reflected proxy dynamics in a hotly contested region.

    Lesson: Proxy wars were a way to fight without triggering a world war. The battlefield was shifted onto weaker states, whose sovereignty was often reduced to a pawn in the larger game.

    Modern Proxy Wars — A Crowded Chessboard

    Today, proxy wars are more complex. They are no longer simply US vs. Russia. Instead, multiple actors — regional powers, private armies, even cyber groups — compete in overlapping battlefields.

    Examples include:

    • Ukraine (2022–ongoing): While Russia invaded directly, Western powers have turned Ukraine into a proxy theater by providing arms, intelligence, and financial support.
    • Yemen: A humanitarian catastrophe fueled by Saudi Arabia and Iran, backing opposite sides of a civil war.
    • Syria: Perhaps the quintessential modern proxy war, with Russia, Iran, Turkey, the US, and Gulf states backing different factions.
    • Libya: Turkey, Russia, and the UAE funneled weapons and mercenaries into rival governments.
    • Africa’s Sahel: Russia’s Wagner Group and Western special forces vying for influence through fragile regimes in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger.

    In these conflicts, the line between state and non-state actors is blurred — with militias, mercenaries, and hackers all acting as “proxies” in the shadows of great powers.

    Why Proxy Wars Persist

    From a strategic perspective, proxy wars are appealing because they:

    1. Lower Costs – Cheaper than sending divisions of soldiers.
    2. Provide Plausible Deniability – Powers can deny direct involvement when things go wrong.
    3. Extend Influence – States can entrench long-term control through client groups.
    4. Serve as Test Beds – Conflicts like Syria became live laboratories for drones, electronic warfare, and urban combat doctrines.

    But there’s a dark side:

    • Proxy wars drag on for years or decades, with no clear winners.
    • Civilians bear the brunt through famine, mass displacement, and shattered infrastructure.
    • Powers often lose control of their proxies — the Taliban being the most famous example, outgrowing their American and Saudi backers in the 1980s.

    The Future of Proxy Warfare

    The next generation of proxy wars will be even harder to define and contain. Expect to see:

    • AI & Drone Proxies: Yemen’s Houthi rebels already deploy cheap drones against Saudi infrastructure. Future proxies will use AI-driven swarms and loitering munitions.
    • Cyber Proxies: Hacktivist groups like Russia’s Killnet blur the line between state-sanctioned and “rogue” actors, carrying out digital sabotage on behalf of patrons.
    • Private Military 2.0: After Wagner, we may see new corporate mercenary groups funded by states and oligarchs, offering deniability while expanding influence.
    • US–China Rivalries: Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific could become the new arenas where Washington and Beijing test each other through third parties.

    Strategic Takeaways

    For analysts, policymakers, and observers, understanding proxy wars requires:

    • Watching fragile states: Nations with ethnic, religious, or political divides are prime targets.
    • Following the money and arms flow: Whoever controls supply chains controls the war.
    • Identifying chokepoints: Ports, pipelines, and rare earth mines often dictate where proxy conflicts erupt.

    Proxy wars will remain the invisible frontlines of global competition — simmering conflicts that never quite explode into world wars, but reshape geopolitics one battlefield at a time.

  • Floating Ghosts: The Global Menace of Shadow Oil Tankers

    Shadow tanker fleets—also known as dark fleets—are aging vessels operating under the radar to ship sanctioned oil and scarce commodities. These networks have become strategic tools for sanctioned regimes like Russia and Iran to preserve revenue streams without open confrontation.

    What Are Shadow Fleets?

    Shadow fleets are clandestine networks of tankers involved in smuggling sanctioned goods—like crude oil—using deceptive maritime practices to evade detection.


    They operate increasingly outside conventional frameworks, exploiting AIS manipulation, flag-hopping, ship-to-ship transfers, and complex offshore ownership, all to remain invisible to regulators.Wikipedia+2 Wikipedia+2

    Originally adopted by countries like Iran and Venezuela, shadow fleets gained prominence after 2022 when Russia expanded its network to maintain oil exports under Western sanctions.

    Wikipedia Brookings The Washington Post Le Monde.fr

    Key Evasion Tactics

    Concealing identity and routing paths:

    Concealing shipments:

    The Scale of the Shadow Fleet

    Global presence: These ships are spotted across Arctic waters, the English Channel, Gulf of Oman, and Southeast Asia — showing how sanctions networks span the globe.

    Financial Times The Times. Atlantic Council. S&P Global

    Strategic Importance & Risks

    Shadow fleets are more than sanctions loopholes—they are instruments of geopolitical resilience:

    Enforcement vs Evasion: What’s Being Done?

    Regulatory moves:

    • In late 2023, the IMO demanded restrictions on ship-to-ship transfers and called for enhanced inspections of suspicious tankers. Atlantic Council
    • Western sanctions now specifically target vessels, operators, insurers, and ports facilitating shadow fleet operations.The Washington Post Financial Times
    • Countries like the UK are demanding vessels prove valid insurance before transit — an emerging point of pressure. Financial Times

    Limitations remain:

    • Evasion tactics, such as falsified ownership, spoofed AIS, and remote high-sea operations, make enforcement extremely hard.World Ports Atlantic Council
    • Shadow fleets also intersect with broader networks, including Iran’s ghost fleet, expanding beyond oil to other strategic commodities. Wikipedia

    Playbook for Mitigation

    For sanctioning coalitions:

    • Build real-time maritime tracking and cross-jurisdiction enforcement networks.
    • Impose secondary sanctions on insurers, financiers, and intermediaries enabling operations.
    • Leverage satellite imagery and maritime domain awareness tools to flag suspicious behaviors.

    For policymakers:

    • Strengthen international regulation on vessel registration, insurance verification, and end-use accountability.
    • Use sanctions strategically, pairing them with monitoring capabilities to limit evasion routes.

  • Indonesia’s Strategic Rebalance: Modernization, Eastern Deployment, and Industry Independence

    Introduction: Indonesia at the Crossroads of the Indo-Pacific

    Indonesia is often overlooked in global military rankings. When analysts debate the balance of power in Asia, eyes tend to focus on China, India, Japan, and the United States. Yet Indonesia, the world’s largest archipelagic state, sits astride the most important maritime chokepoints on earth: the Strait of Malacca, Sunda Strait, and Lombok Strait.

    Every year, trillions of dollars of trade — including much of China’s and Japan’s energy imports — flow through these waters. To control or secure them is to shape the future of the Indo-Pacific. Indonesia’s military, known as the Tentara Nasional Indonesia (TNI), may not yet match the great powers in raw strength, but its geography, modernization, and neutrality make it one of the most strategically significant forces of the 21st century.

    This deep dive explores how Indonesia’s military is structured, where it is headed, and why its choices will influence the future of regional security.

    1. The Structure of Indonesia’s Military

    🔹 The Army (TNI-AD)

    Indonesia’s army is the backbone of its military, with around 300,000 active personnel. Historically, it has played an outsized role in both politics and security, focusing on internal stability and counterinsurgency.

    • Heavy Equipment: Leopard 2A4 main battle tanks, BMP-3F infantry fighting vehicles, and AH-64E Apache attack helicopters.
    • Special Forces: Kopassus, Indonesia’s elite special operations unit, specializes in counter-terrorism and unconventional warfare. Though highly capable, it has a controversial history due to human rights abuses in East Timor and Papua.

    The army’s priority remains guarding Indonesia’s vast and diverse islands, preventing separatism, and projecting presence across its huge archipelagic territory.

    🔹 The Navy (TNI-AL)

    With 74,000 personnel, Indonesia’s navy has ambitions to shift from a green-water force to a credible blue-water navy.

    • Submarines: 4 South Korean-built Type 209/1400 submarines.
    • Surface Fleet: 6 Dutch-designed Sigma-class corvettes, indigenous fast-attack craft, and Makassar-class landing platform docks (LPDs) that allow limited amphibious operations.
    • Role: Securing sea lanes, countering illegal fishing, and reinforcing Indonesia’s sovereignty in the Natuna Islands, where its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) overlaps with China’s Nine-Dash Line claims.

    The navy is increasingly vital. With over 17,000 islands to defend, sea power is the key to deterrence and maritime domain control.

    🔹 The Air Force (TNI-AU)

    Indonesia’s air force has about 34,000 personnel and a mixed fleet that reflects its balancing strategy between great powers.

    • Current Fighters: F-16C/D Block 52ID, Su-27SK, and Su-30MK2.
    • Modernization: Orders have been placed for 42 Rafale fighters (France) and 24 F-15EX fighters (U.S.), which will significantly upgrade its capabilities.
    • Future Tech: Investment in drones, UAVs, and long-range strike platforms.

    The combination of Rafales and F-15EX will give Indonesia one of the most powerful air forces in Southeast Asia by the mid-2030s.

    2. Defense Modernization and Ambitions

    Indonesia spends around $13–15 billion annually on defense, about 0.7–0.8% of GDP. While relatively low compared to its size, there are plans to increase spending to 1.5% of GDP by 2035, nearly doubling its defense capacity.

    🔸 The Minimum Essential Force (MEF)

    The MEF is Indonesia’s three-phase modernization roadmap (2009–2025) designed to ensure the military reaches a “minimum credible deterrent.” Its goals:

    • Interoperability between branches.
    • Modernization of outdated Cold War-era platforms.
    • Increased maritime defense.

    🔸 Procurement Strategy

    Unlike many countries that rely heavily on a single partner, Indonesia deliberately diversifies procurement:

    • U.S.: F-15EX, Apache helicopters.
    • France: Rafale jets, Scorpène submarines (negotiations ongoing).
    • South Korea: Submarines and co-development of the KF-21 stealth fighter.
    • Domestic Industry: PT PAL (shipbuilding), PTDI (aerospace), and Pindad (land systems).

    This strategy prevents dependency but creates logistical complexity — maintaining parts and training across such a varied arsenal is a challenge.

    3. Geostrategic Pressures

    🔹 South China Sea Tensions

    Indonesia officially rejects Beijing’s Nine-Dash Line, but clashes are frequent in the Natuna Islands. Chinese fishing fleets, backed by armed coast guards, often test Indonesian resolve. In response, Jakarta has expanded bases and deployed F-16s to Natuna.

    🔹 Archipelagic Vulnerability

    Indonesia’s geography is both a strength and a weakness. Defending 17,000 islands requires enormous logistical reach. Maritime domain awareness is limited, with insufficient radar and satellite coverage to track all illegal incursions.

    🔹 Balancing Global Powers

    Indonesia adheres to a “free and active” foreign policy — avoiding formal alliances while engaging multiple partners.

    • With the U.S., it conducts joint training and buys advanced platforms.
    • With China, it maintains economic ties but pushes back against maritime assertiveness.
    • With Australia and Japan, it strengthens maritime cooperation and regional security coordination.

    Jakarta’s neutrality makes it a swing state in the Indo-Pacific.

    4. Grey-Zone and Unconventional Challenges

    Beyond traditional threats, Indonesia faces grey-zone warfare and non-traditional security issues:

    • Illegal Fishing: Foreign vessels cost Indonesia up to $4 billion annually. The navy’s dramatic tactic of blowing up seized vessels has become a symbol of resolve.
    • Terrorism: Groups linked to Jemaah Islamiyah and ISIS remain a domestic threat, though weakened by counter-terror units like Densus 88 and Kopassus.
    • Cyber Threats: As a digitally connected economy, Indonesia is investing in a Cyber Defense Command to protect infrastructure.

    5. Indonesia in 2035 – The Silent Giant Rises

    If modernization plans succeed, Indonesia in 2035 will look very different:

    • Blue-Water Navy: Expansion to 12–14 submarines, indigenous frigates, and drone ships.
    • Air Superiority: A powerful mix of Rafale and F-15EX, supported by drones and surveillance aircraft.
    • Defense Industry Independence: Growing capacity in aerospace and naval shipbuilding will reduce reliance on foreign suppliers.
    • Strategic Autonomy: Unlike Vietnam or the Philippines, Indonesia is unlikely to align firmly with either Washington or Beijing — giving it leverage as a balancing power.

    6. Strategic Takeaways

    1. Indonesia’s military is not yet among the great powers, but its geography and modernization make it impossible to ignore.
    2. Its doctrine is evolving from internal defense to regional sea control and deterrence.
    3. In a conflict over the South China Sea, Indonesia could be a kingmaker, tilting the balance toward the U.S., China, or maintaining neutrality.
    4. By 2035, if modernization goals are realized, Indonesia could emerge as Southeast Asia’s dominant military power.

    Conclusion: The Archipelagic Power to Watch

    Indonesia’s military today is still a work in progress — underfunded, spread thin across vast geography, and reliant on a patchwork of imported systems. But tomorrow, it may become the guardian of Southeast Asia’s sea lanes, a neutral balancer between great powers, and a formidable force in its own right.

    For strategists watching the Indo-Pacific, one lesson is clear: ignore Indonesia at your peril.